Copyright © Steve Miller
------------------------------------------------------------
The press has no subpoena power. No authority to compel anyone to talk -- under oath or otherwise. No power to fine, jail or punish. All we can do is flip on the white light of public scrutiny and watch the bureaucratic cockroaches skitter. As for that assumption that the five-year federal statute of limitations has lapsed, a news story this past week quoted one lawyer as saying, "If somebody still has the benefit of what was a crime, it's not a stretch to argue that it is a continuing crime." He said if he were the U.S. attorney he would impanel a grand jury and subpoena all the players for testimony under oath.
FULL COLUMN: http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2005/Nov-13-Sun-2005/opinion/4250741.html
------------------------------------------------------
Nov. 13, 2005
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal
WEEK
IN REVIEW: Misconduct alleged in Walters land deal
Decisions by Las Vegas' former public works director helped developer Bill Walters before, during and after he took control of city land to build a golf course, according to a City Hall memo released Monday.
FULL STORY: http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2005/Nov-13-Sun-2005/news/4259910.html
Oscar Goodman Mayor has invited former, current officials to council meeting |
Mayor Oscar Goodman acknowledged Monday that he knew of possible wrongdoing by a city official before a controversial vote to allow homes to be built on golf course land.
Goodman said he knew of allegations that in the 1990s the public works director had violated city rules to help developer Bill Walters acquire city land and then develop a golf course on the land.
FULL STORY: http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2005/Nov-15-Tue-2005/news/4310641.html
-----------------------------------------------------
The document (below) deeding Billy Walters' Las Vegas Country Club home to Oscar Goodman tells it all. Goodman's one half million dollar legal fee was secured by Walters' home in the late 1980's. Goodman did not reveal this fact until Nov. 2, after Robert Rose and I filed an ethics complaint against him. On Nov. 2, Goodman said, "Because there is an ethics complaint filed against me, I want to disclose that I once represented Mr. Walters, but that was a long time ago." He then turned to his stooge Brad Jerbic, the city attorney, who said, "That relationship ended years ago and is not relevant to the proceedings at hand. Therefore, a disclosure is not necessary." Goodman took his payoff years ago, and now is doing everything in his power to reward Walters, even if it costs the taxpayers millions of dollars. -- SM
------------------------------------------------------------------
Nov. 16, 2005
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal
COUNCIL
DECISION: Official:Deal will cost city
Environmental officer warns of
harm to sewage treatment plant
By DAVID McGRATH SCHWARTZ
REVIEW-JOURNAL
The city's environmental officer blasted Tuesday a deal that would allow a developer to turn a golf course next to the city's sewage treatment plant into a 1,200-home subdivision and said it will cost taxpayers an additional $30 million... "To jeopardize that (sewage treatment) facility's compliance to make one person richer, who's already rich, makes no sense to me," Wohletz said. She said she warned City Manager Doug Selby before the council voted on the matter on Nov. 2 that the city was getting a bad deal if it removed the restriction on developing the golf course into homes. To reduce odors at the sewage treatment plant to protect its new neighbors would cost the city $30 million, she said... When Wohletz was asked why she was coming forward now, she told a reporter, "Because you called me." In her letter to Reese, dated Nov. 4, Wohletz wrote: "I am fully prepared to resign immediately if necessary. My last boss, Michael Naylor, once told me that if my ethics were bothering me then it was time to find another job. I always thought that was some of the best advice that I was ever given."
FULL STORY: http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2005/Nov-16-Wed-2005/news/4334777.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Nov.
16, 2005
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal
EDITORIAL:
Who will speak for taxpayers?
City Council must ask, answer a
lot of tough questions about Walters deal
Mayor Oscar Goodman acknowledged Monday that he knew of the allegations when he cast his vote to enrich Mr. Walters. But Councilman Steve Wolfson didn't appreciate the lack of full disclosure, so he returned the issue to today's agenda at City Hall. The council will consider rescinding last week's vote, and many key figures and former elected officials associated with the deal are expected to be on hand.
FULL EDITORIAL: http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2005/Nov-16-Wed-2005/opinion/4326770.html
MORE INFORMATION:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TODAY'S COUNCIL MEETING CAN BE VIEWED AT: http://www.lasvegasnevada.gov/Find/Sept2005.asp#6166
Click on "Watch KCLV TV."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stacy M. Jennings Executive Director Commission on Ethics RE: Request for Opinion No. 05-57
November 14, 2005 ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE AND INFORMATION to be added to Request for Opinion Dear Ms. Jennings: Please add Mr. Richard Goecke to the witness list in the above referenced matter. Mr. Goecke is the former City of Las Vegas Director of Public Works, and his address is available at the office of the City Clerk. Also, please include the enclosed November 15, 2005 Las Vegas Review Journal (front page) story: “Goodman discounts row over Walters land deal.” This article discloses that Mayor Goodman knew of possible wrongdoing by a city official (Goecke) before his controversial vote for the enrichment of his former client, Mr. Walters.
During the October 19, 2005 city council meeting, Mayor Goodman stated that, because there is an ethics complaint pending against him, he needs to disclose that he was the criminal defense attorney for Mr. Walters in the late 1980s. He then referred to his city attorney who stated that the business relationship was old, and no longer relevant enough to require public disclosure. This forced disclosure is the first time Mayor Goodman has made this information available to the public since 2000, and would probably have gone ignored had our Request for Opinion not been filed. Robert Rose |